Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Facundo Diaz Acosta vs Jesper De Jong Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Acosta vs Jong analysis and find out who is favored!
Facundo Diaz Acosta vs Jesper De Jong Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Acosta 1 - 0 Jong
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Acosta has won 55.07% of points on their second serve, while Jong has won 49.91%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Acosta, in recent form, has won 50.35% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jong has won 50.64%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.7% and 32.68% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Acosta has saved 60% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jong has saved 61.54% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Acosta has won 61.54% of matches played (W/L 40/ 25), with Jong winning 58.62% (W/L 34/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Acosta has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 180/ 102), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Jong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 80/ 38), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Acosta has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 69.44% of matches (W/L 25/ 11), where as Jong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.82% of matches (W/L 20/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Acosta winning 1 times and Jong being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Acosta winning 2 and Jong winning 0. The last match between Acosta and Jong was at the M15 Majadahonda, 30-05-2019, Second, Clay with Facundo Diaz Acosta getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:5:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Acosta and Jong have played a deciding set 0 times, with Acosta winning 0 times and Jong 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Acosta winning 0, and Jong 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Acosta has played against opponents with an average rank of 236.46 while Jong has played against players with an average rank of 317.12.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Acosta has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jong has won 41% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Acosta has converted 41.62% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jong has converted 47.66% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
55
Rank
47
High
23
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
176
Rank
135
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
62% (203-124)
Career Total W/L
62% (225-136)
54% (14-12)
YTD W/L
60% (21-14)
$229,460
Career Prize Money
$430,415
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Facundo Diaz Acosta | Jesper De Jong |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:5:0 | 1:5:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (22/42) | 50% (20/40) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (14/22) | 40% (8/20) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 65% (13/20) | 35% (7/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 63% (25/40) | 36% (15/42) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-0 |
Stats 
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Jesper De Jong
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
50%
(
20 of
40)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
14 of
22)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
30
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Facundo Diaz Acosta | Jesper De Jong |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 54% (14/12) | 60% (21/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (35/30) | 56% (49/38) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (322/313) | 53% (431/384) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 70% (7/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (12/8) | 61% (14/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.45 |
| Aces Total | 65 | 179 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 73 | 99 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:3:45 | 1:55:46 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 125.62 | 316.11 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1263/1973) | 59% (1549/2639) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (854/1263) | 71% (1094/1549) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (391/710) | 50% (544/1090) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (72/173) | 48% (112/235) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (740/1959) | 40% (1014/2544) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 80% (8/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/4) | 50% (1/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 70% (14/6) | 0% (0/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 57% (12/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (14/25) | 59% (17/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 60% (3/5) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 62% (8/13) | 55% (6/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 45% (5/11) | 50% (5/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (12/10) | 95% (19/18) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (12/2) | 5% (19/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (14/4) | 19% (16/3) |
Facundo Diaz Acosta Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
56%
(
45 of
80)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
7
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
0
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
64%
(
67 of
104)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
3
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
41 of
52)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
38 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
27 of
85)
93
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Fabian Marozsan
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Borna Coric
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Daniel Rincon
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
28 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexei Popyrin
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
61%
(
57 of
93)
1st Serve %
63%
(
69 of
110)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
110)
109
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(4) 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Jesper De Jong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Jesper De Jong
70%
(
78 of
112)
1st Serve %
58%
(
72 of
124)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
40%
(
45 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
61 of
124)
128
Total Points Won
108
|
6-3 6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jack Draper
50%
(
77 of
154)
1st Serve %
50%
(
75 of
149)
11
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
9
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
51 of
75)
52%
(
40 of
77)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
90%
(
9 of
10)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
37%
(
57 of
154)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
60 of
149)
157
Total Points Won
146
|
7-5 6-4 6-7(3) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jeff Wolf
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
41%
(
18 of
44)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Dennis Novak
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Jesper De Jong
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
49%
(
45 of
92)
8
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
3
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
31 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
92)
100
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Jesper De Jong
49%
(
42 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
70%
(
30 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jurij Rodionov
54%
(
58 of
107)
1st Serve %
45%
(
40 of
89)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
51%
(
25 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
47 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
99
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Jesper De Jong
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Francesco Passaro
65%
(
68 of
104)
1st Serve %
75%
(
81 of
108)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
53 of
68)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
49 of
81)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
35 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
108)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
view more
Acosta Vs Jong Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
